1 thought on “wholesale markup on jewelry Who is the most conscience of Tesla and BYD?”
Ben
wholesale wall jewelry Nothing has been opened, support domestic production.
The two brands, the two brands are obviously more sincere in BYD products, Tesla and BYD are always compared, because they are first -line new energy vehicle brands in terms of sales. They seem to be both. They seem to be both. Big giants in the industry; however, from the real quality of technical reserves and mass production cars, Tesla is just a "bubble". Old Malaysia is a custard. His focus is mainly on the capital market, including the virtual currency market For example, the "dog currency" by his Cue. But some views believe that Tesla's car is still more sincere. For example, the structure of the whole aluminum body can achieve lightweight and high intensity, just don't watch the news? MODEL 3's car is already a hybrid structure of steel and aluminum. In a collision test in a certain institution, it directly abandons the confrontation with a domestic flagship new energy sedan. When controlling, you will not mention whether you are not equal. As for the control, there is nothing to talk about. It still takes the main attack high performance and control M3 as a reference. This car uses the suspension structure of the two fork arms and multi -link to achieve the limit of 77km/h; Mid -large cars achieved an extreme score of 80km/h with the suspension of the McPersga multi -link. It's control limit of the vehicle is not in which suspension structure is used. Only on the premise of the level of adjustment, there is a higher standard suspension improvement. Strong, some tangible fifty -five links are "residue". BYD will not only conduct strict road tests in the suspension adjustment, but also pass the 24 -channel platform to perform an ultra -long cycle simulation test. The vehicle media that passed the vehicle test, we said that they were convinced. What is interesting is the BYD truck on the tables of different channels. It does not talk about the performance of the vehicle and control, what other advantages of BYD's Bigsla? The advantages visible to the naked eye do not need to be discussed. For example, the interior of Han and Tang dynasties uses a large amount of leather materials and solid wood materials, and even the old car has used real carbon fiber materials to cover it. Planting cars can be compared with; the design level of the vehicle is obviously higher, and individuals are always unacceptable to M3/Y's strange front and body lines. Secondly, the pollutant control level of vehicle materials is also leading BYD, and it can be divided into high and low simply from whether there is a prominent odor. Tesla's M3/Y is more strange. First of all, it has no instrument panel. The content of the instrument must be displayed through the screen of the vehicle; some drivers believe that they can adapt, but hundreds of thousands of tablet cars have to adapt to adaptation Its very unreasonable design, isn't it full? However, the focus of the instrument displayed by the vehicle is under different light angles or conditions. Sometimes it really does not see clearly, and the identification efficiency and effect are quite poor. The vehicles of the brand at the same time have used a large number of non -vehicle -level chips by the real hammer, resulting in the driver of the high frequency of the vehicle, the high temperature is prone to problems, and the low temperature is prone to problems; this is a very attitude. The design of the M3/Y design does not fully consider driving safety, and the car brand that ignores this problem in order to control the cost is not worth considering. In the last thing to understand is Tesla's "complete autonomous driving system". Before the rules are strictly regulated, Tesla has always declared that its driving system can meet the "complete" standard. Level; but the real level of this system cannot even reach L3. During the use process, there are frequent problems. The serious transportation caused by using this system as a complete autonomous driving is in various areas of Europe, America, and Asia -Pacific. After the problem was fermented, Tesla was also stunned. The current Tesla official website added an annotation under "fully autonomous driving", indicating that it does not have the ability to driving, which actually hammered Tesla's long -term false publicity and publicity and publicity and publicity of Tesla Sales fraud. So there is a level of explanation in autonomous driving? BYD is conservative in this regard. The vehicle has L2 -level auxiliary driving capabilities but is just that; but BYD won the championship of smart driving cars many years ago. Crash or misunderstanding. In other words, BYD is capable of creating high -standard autonomous vehicles, but based on the current road environment, laws and regulations, hardware standards, etc., the probability of the problem of autonomous vehicles that can be created will be high. Before the "millions of kilometers of zero failure", responsible car companies should not take complete autonomous driving as a selling point. So BYD's seemingly conservative attitude is actually more secure. At this stage, smart cars are only suitable for exploring the vehicle and the Internet of Things. In summary, the hot -selling brands of the two new energy vehicles are very different in terms of attitude. In fact, Tesla still uses the "cultural nuclear weapons" formed by speculatory brands and formed for many years. Readers who are interested in this topic can take a look at this article. Tesla once had a user that advertised "Gao Zhi", which is also equivalent to such roles. There is no reason why there is no reason and hate why there is no lack of cultural traitors in various fields BYD is a car company that rely on high vertical integration and deep technology research and development. It is currently the only core three -electric technology in the world. And IGBT/MUC chip technology car companies are a R
wholesale wall jewelry Nothing has been opened, support domestic production.
The two brands, the two brands are obviously more sincere in BYD products, Tesla and BYD are always compared, because they are first -line new energy vehicle brands in terms of sales. They seem to be both. They seem to be both. Big giants in the industry; however, from the real quality of technical reserves and mass production cars, Tesla is just a "bubble". Old Malaysia is a custard. His focus is mainly on the capital market, including the virtual currency market For example, the "dog currency" by his Cue.
But some views believe that Tesla's car is still more sincere. For example, the structure of the whole aluminum body can achieve lightweight and high intensity, just don't watch the news?
MODEL 3's car is already a hybrid structure of steel and aluminum. In a collision test in a certain institution, it directly abandons the confrontation with a domestic flagship new energy sedan. When controlling, you will not mention whether you are not equal. As for the control, there is nothing to talk about. It still takes the main attack high performance and control M3 as a reference. This car uses the suspension structure of the two fork arms and multi -link to achieve the limit of 77km/h; Mid -large cars achieved an extreme score of 80km/h with the suspension of the McPersga multi -link.
It's control limit of the vehicle is not in which suspension structure is used. Only on the premise of the level of adjustment, there is a higher standard suspension improvement. Strong, some tangible fifty -five links are "residue". BYD will not only conduct strict road tests in the suspension adjustment, but also pass the 24 -channel platform to perform an ultra -long cycle simulation test. The vehicle media that passed the vehicle test, we said that they were convinced. What is interesting is the BYD truck on the tables of different channels.
It does not talk about the performance of the vehicle and control, what other advantages of BYD's Bigsla?
The advantages visible to the naked eye do not need to be discussed. For example, the interior of Han and Tang dynasties uses a large amount of leather materials and solid wood materials, and even the old car has used real carbon fiber materials to cover it. Planting cars can be compared with; the design level of the vehicle is obviously higher, and individuals are always unacceptable to M3/Y's strange front and body lines. Secondly, the pollutant control level of vehicle materials is also leading BYD, and it can be divided into high and low simply from whether there is a prominent odor.
Tesla's M3/Y is more strange. First of all, it has no instrument panel. The content of the instrument must be displayed through the screen of the vehicle; some drivers believe that they can adapt, but hundreds of thousands of tablet cars have to adapt to adaptation Its very unreasonable design, isn't it full? However, the focus of the instrument displayed by the vehicle is under different light angles or conditions. Sometimes it really does not see clearly, and the identification efficiency and effect are quite poor.
The vehicles of the brand at the same time have used a large number of non -vehicle -level chips by the real hammer, resulting in the driver of the high frequency of the vehicle, the high temperature is prone to problems, and the low temperature is prone to problems; this is a very attitude. The design of the M3/Y design does not fully consider driving safety, and the car brand that ignores this problem in order to control the cost is not worth considering.
In the last thing to understand is Tesla's "complete autonomous driving system". Before the rules are strictly regulated, Tesla has always declared that its driving system can meet the "complete" standard. Level; but the real level of this system cannot even reach L3. During the use process, there are frequent problems. The serious transportation caused by using this system as a complete autonomous driving is in various areas of Europe, America, and Asia -Pacific. After the problem was fermented, Tesla was also stunned. The current Tesla official website added an annotation under "fully autonomous driving", indicating that it does not have the ability to driving, which actually hammered Tesla's long -term false publicity and publicity and publicity and publicity of Tesla Sales fraud.
So there is a level of explanation in autonomous driving? BYD is conservative in this regard. The vehicle has L2 -level auxiliary driving capabilities but is just that; but BYD won the championship of smart driving cars many years ago. Crash or misunderstanding. In other words, BYD is capable of creating high -standard autonomous vehicles, but based on the current road environment, laws and regulations, hardware standards, etc., the probability of the problem of autonomous vehicles that can be created will be high. Before the "millions of kilometers of zero failure", responsible car companies should not take complete autonomous driving as a selling point.
So BYD's seemingly conservative attitude is actually more secure. At this stage, smart cars are only suitable for exploring the vehicle and the Internet of Things.
In summary, the hot -selling brands of the two new energy vehicles are very different in terms of attitude. In fact, Tesla still uses the "cultural nuclear weapons" formed by speculatory brands and formed for many years. Readers who are interested in this topic can take a look at this article. Tesla once had a user that advertised "Gao Zhi", which is also equivalent to such roles. There is no reason why there is no reason and hate why there is no lack of cultural traitors in various fields
BYD is a car company that rely on high vertical integration and deep technology research and development. It is currently the only core three -electric technology in the world. And IGBT/MUC chip technology car companies are a R