5 thoughts on “Girls committed suicide after recharging 60,000 yuan in the game. Is the platform need to pay back?”
Leona
In fact, this problem depends on which perspective we say. If we say that from a legal perspective, then the game platform does not have this obligation, or there is no need to pay for this money, but if it is from it, it is from it to from the observation of this money, but if it is from it, it is from it. To consider this problem moral or from the perspective of human nature, I think the game platform is still necessary to return this money to others. In fact, what we are talking about is Tencent. This happened. Many people feel particularly sorry that no one wants to see it. After the girl recharged 60,000 yuan on the Tencent platform, she felt that she was not very right. Later, I thought that she felt particularly scared, so the girl finally walked to the extreme jump to commit suicide. After the girl jumped off the building and committed suicide, the child's parents also found Tencent's game platform, claiming that the 60,000 yuan was recharged by the child. The parents did not know and wanted to let the platform refund the money. However, the Tencent platform refused to refund the funds, asking the other party to show that the funds were refunded by the relevant evidence of the child's separate recharge. First of all, from a legal perspective, there is no problem with Tencent's approach. Because Tencent does not have any means of deception. When recharging these costs, Tencent will also have a lot of windows jumping out to remind you that minors prohibit recharge. In addition, the various game anti -induction systems under Tencent are really in place, so if we simply look at Tencent's approach from a legal perspective, there is no problem. But if you consider from the perspective of humanity or morality, Tencent's approach will be arrears. As the so -called deceased is big, and the little girl itself belongs to the vulnerable group in the social group, and now that the little girl is really jumping off the building, so I think Tencent should return these 60,000 yuan first. Renminbi, this can also appease the parents of the little girl. Of course, from the perspective of Tencent, I think they must not want to open this first. Recently, the game company itself is based on making money.
Major popular games-Line first rushing welfare discounts-popular mobile game box web links ~ ~ ~ At this time, Ji Yang's grandeur: Emperor, you are just that. If he can get this magic Tomahawk, his attack power will definitely add a level. Obviously, this ghost Supreme is ready to set foot in the Tongtian Tower, so it is suppressed.
It is not necessary, because it is voluntarily choosing consumption, the platform also needs operating costs, and the platform cannot be abducted morally.
In fact, this problem depends on which perspective we say. If we say that from a legal perspective, then the game platform does not have this obligation, or there is no need to pay for this money, but if it is from it, it is from it to from the observation of this money, but if it is from it, it is from it. To consider this problem moral or from the perspective of human nature, I think the game platform is still necessary to return this money to others.
In fact, what we are talking about is Tencent. This happened. Many people feel particularly sorry that no one wants to see it. After the girl recharged 60,000 yuan on the Tencent platform, she felt that she was not very right. Later, I thought that she felt particularly scared, so the girl finally walked to the extreme jump to commit suicide. After the girl jumped off the building and committed suicide, the child's parents also found Tencent's game platform, claiming that the 60,000 yuan was recharged by the child. The parents did not know and wanted to let the platform refund the money. However, the Tencent platform refused to refund the funds, asking the other party to show that the funds were refunded by the relevant evidence of the child's separate recharge.
First of all, from a legal perspective, there is no problem with Tencent's approach. Because Tencent does not have any means of deception. When recharging these costs, Tencent will also have a lot of windows jumping out to remind you that minors prohibit recharge. In addition, the various game anti -induction systems under Tencent are really in place, so if we simply look at Tencent's approach from a legal perspective, there is no problem.
But if you consider from the perspective of humanity or morality, Tencent's approach will be arrears. As the so -called deceased is big, and the little girl itself belongs to the vulnerable group in the social group, and now that the little girl is really jumping off the building, so I think Tencent should return these 60,000 yuan first. Renminbi, this can also appease the parents of the little girl. Of course, from the perspective of Tencent, I think they must not want to open this first. Recently, the game company itself is based on making money.
Major popular games-Line first rushing welfare discounts-popular mobile game box
web links
~
~
~
At this time, Ji Yang's grandeur: Emperor, you are just that. If he can get this magic Tomahawk, his attack power will definitely add a level. Obviously, this ghost Supreme is ready to set foot in the Tongtian Tower, so it is suppressed.
In the face of this kind of thing, I personally think that the platform should pay back. Because the parties have paid a painful price.
It is not necessary, because it is voluntarily choosing consumption, the platform also needs operating costs, and the platform cannot be abducted morally.
The platform is still necessary to repay the money, after all, this girl is not yet an adult.